Wood (stove) Firing
#1
Posted 17 December 2012 - 04:34 PM
I have been taking a few days relaxing at the beach and brought with me a low fire cone pack to see what i can do with a beach fire.
It turned out i got washed out by the tide so i had to move my experiment to the woodstove in my house, not a fireplace, an insulated, high draft, super tall chimney, woodstove.
I had a ^021, a ^018 and a ^012 in the pack, the first 2 came out all blisters and melted while the ^012 was, as my mentor would say, "twitching" or just starting to bend.
I now have a little doodad i made in there now (i used ^10 stoneware clay with lots of grog).
When i get home to my camera i'll snap a few photos.
Has anybody ever done this before?
What kinds of glazes/slips/terra sigilata could i use at such low temperature to make a vessel that will hold water?
Or could just a simple burnishing job do the trick?
So if any of ya'll with pitfiring experience can chime in your 2 cents i would much appreciate it!
-Burt
#2
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:38 PM
Why did they blister like that????
I heard lead can do that in cones, do these low temp cones have lead in them? or did they used too, cause as i said these are really old.
Cheers!
-Burt
Attached File(s)
-
2012-12-17-142928_1.jpg (131.6K)
Number of downloads: 121 -
2012-12-17-142946_3.jpg (161.52K)
Number of downloads: 111
#3
Posted 17 December 2012 - 07:12 PM
It most likely won't hold water if you are using stoneware or even an earthenware.
There are sealers you could use but they would not be food safe.
The lowest glaze I know is about 09 . They could exist but I am unaware of them.
Marcia
#4
Posted 17 December 2012 - 07:27 PM
I am not super attached to them being functional, like holding water, i'm all in this for the fun of it.
I made a few clay pipes, that is the doodad currently in todays wood stove firing at the beach; i am hoping it will take on resin from smoke an "color up" similar to meerschaum pipes
I did not bisque it before the fire, i took it up slow.....
Also i have a bowl (that was bisque fired) layed upside down on top to protect it from the logs and maybe act as a saggar and promote a slower heating and cooling for my small, rather delicate, piece.
My cone pack was done in this same way and did not crack or explode...... I microwaved the bone dry cone pack and pipe on LOW for about 30-45 seconds to really drive out any plastic water left.
Thanks!
-Burt
#6
Posted 18 December 2012 - 03:10 PM
I am fairly certain that the color is from the smoke. At Bisque the clay is a dull pink and when high fired in OX it is a light tan/buff color and when it is in RDX it is very gritty, with lots of iron flecking; it almost looks like yellow/orange sandstone.
Have you ever had a cone pack bubble up like that? Do you think that the fact that they were heated well beyond their bending point that made them blister/bloat?
Cheers!
#7
Posted 18 December 2012 - 05:01 PM
Round2potter, on 17 December 2012 - 05:38 PM, said:
Why did they blister like that????
I heard lead can do that in cones, do these low temp cones have lead in them? or did they used too, cause as i said these are really old.
Cheers!
-Burt
Cones do not go bad or get old as long as you keep them DRY-I have cones that are over 30 years old and work just fine.
As far as lead in them I cannot attest to that as its a trade secret as to what's on the cones and Orton is not letting this info out.
Cones melt at exact temps and that means they are all formulated differently. Orton would tell you if lead was present.
My guess is you are firing in a wood fire/smokey environment and that cone is way overfired as well. What's the blue cone pad material-looks like playdoe?
MaRK
www.liscomhillpottery.com
#8
Posted 31 December 2012 - 05:13 PM
I was able to find little shelves that work great in the cramped space; i think i am now on my 5th or 6th bisque fire in the stove (yes everything was green ware) and i seem to be really getting that hand of it.
The only pieces i have lost were due to either being a little wet still and todays' disaster that i took out with a log that toppled a shelf onto it breaking it instantly...........
Also, i have managed to get the hang of the damper to control the atmosphere; left open my pieces are a nice pure pink like i would expect form an electric kiln, and when i shut the damper (at peak temperature) they get smoked a bit. Also, covering the pieces with ash during the cooling gets things blackened and smoky.
I don't have any cones with me, but judging from the absorbency of the clay i would say that i am hitting ^08 easy. I'll bet i could get it hotter but i don't really feel like totally wrecking my wood stove!
My firing schedule is simple; i start the fire small and get it going with the damper closed and the door open, then after 45 minutes to an hour (when the peices are visibly black i shut the door and open the damper only enough to keep the fire from going out, if every i feel it is heating to fast i crack the door to let in cool air (shuting the damper accordingly). After the first gentle hour of babysitting i stoke it up and keep it there for an solid hour then i let it burn out (usually 20-30 minutes) then i crack the door to keep lots of O2 to prevent the blackening of peices and let it burn out completely.
It is probably best to let it cool naturally but i am typically so anxious to get it out i open the door as much as i can without smoke escaping and leave it untill i can pull out a shelf and put it on top of the stove where it can cool fast but not too fast.
Thats about it; i managed a 3 hour start to finish fire (finish as in holding a cool piece in my bare hand) yesterday with none of the pieces lost.
-Burt
#9
Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:06 AM
Mark C., on 18 December 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
As far as lead in them I cannot attest to that as its a trade secret as to what's on the cones and Orton is not letting this info out.
In some of the very much older low range cones (can't remember how long ago... it seems like yesterday.... but it has to be 20+ years.....might be 30+)...... some cones did contain lead. I understand that Orton reformulated them many years ago. (They also came up with the L.I (low iron) cones for the 0 series a long while ago.)
Mark C., on 18 December 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
Actually cones melt (deform) based upon precise levels of heat work, not on temperature. It is a temperature and time relationship. That is why cone charts show "rate of climb" and differing end point temperature on them. For a given "cone value" .... if you fire at a faster rate of climb then the end point temperature reached (when the tip of the cone is curved down to the base) will be at a higher temperature than if you fire at a slower rate of climb.
best,
................john
Immediate Past President; Potters Council
Professor of Ceramics; New Hampshire Insitute of Art
http://www.JohnBaymore.com
#10
Posted 01 January 2013 - 01:29 PM
#11
Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:15 AM
Cheers!
-Burt
Attached File(s)
-
IMG_2168.JPG (886.27K)
Number of downloads: 68 -
IMG_2169.JPG (999.86K)
Number of downloads: 72 -
IMG_2165.JPG (987.32K)
Number of downloads: 53 -
IMG_2167.JPG (944.98K)
Number of downloads: 36
#12
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:01 AM
I was worrying about your fire place firings. Normal wood stove insulation may not be rated for high intensity burns. be really careful with that.
Marcia
#13
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:02 AM
I was worrying about your fire place firings. Normal wood stove insulation may not be rated for high intensity burns. be really careful with that.
Marcia
#15
Posted 25 January 2013 - 01:29 AM
Marcia,
I agree that it is kinda risky, but this woodstove is good, also i am not really firing it THAT much hotter than normal woodstove use.
A four foot fire box would be so much fin; this old beehive wood stove sounds like dream!
-Burt
#16
Posted 25 January 2013 - 11:08 AM
Mark C., on 18 December 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
If that were true there would be no need for cones. Each cone melts at a WIDE RANGE of temps because it is measuring heat work (time and temp).
Jim
"But it does move," said Galileo under his breath.
#17
Posted 25 January 2013 - 03:13 PM
JBaymore, on 01 January 2013 - 10:06 AM, said:
Mark C., on 18 December 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
As far as lead in them I cannot attest to that as its a trade secret as to what's on the cones and Orton is not letting this info out.
In some of the very much older low range cones (can't remember how long ago... it seems like yesterday.... but it has to be 20+ years.....might be 30+)...... some cones did contain lead. I understand that Orton reformulated them many years ago. (They also came up with the L.I (low iron) cones for the 0 series a long while ago.)
Mark C., on 18 December 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
Actually cones melt (deform) based upon precise levels of heat work, not on temperature. It is a temperature and time relationship. That is why cone charts show "rate of climb" and differing end point temperature on them. For a given "cone value" .... if you fire at a faster rate of climb then the end point temperature reached (when the tip of the cone is curved down to the base) will be at a higher temperature than if you fire at a slower rate of climb.
best,
................john
Jim
John covered this very well a few posts up. I still have cones from 40 years ago actually from the 50s as well which may have lead as they are low #s like 017.
Mark
www.liscomhillpottery.com
#18
Posted 25 January 2013 - 04:31 PM
Mark C., on 25 January 2013 - 03:13 PM, said:
Mark
I have no idea what it has to do with anything but congratulations on having 40-year-old cones. That must make you very proud!
Jim
"But it does move," said Galileo under his breath.
#20
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:02 AM
Round2potter, on 26 January 2013 - 01:45 AM, said:
Cheers
They probably still do have lead in them. Why would they want to remove the lead?
Jim
"But it does move," said Galileo under his breath.

Sign In
Register
Help












MultiQuote




