: Firing ranges for low fire clay -

Jump to content

Share Topic:   facebook stumbleupon del-icio-us digg email google mixx reddit
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Firing ranges for low fire clay What is the difference in strength? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Isculpt Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 176
  • Joined: 03-April 10

Posted 02 October 2012 - 09:36 AM

I usually work in terra cotta or other low fire clays. When there is a firing range given for a clay, I understand that the high end of the range will provide the most strength in the finished, fired piece (although I'm told that it won't become vitreous if it's lowfire clay), but what, specifically, is the lower number telling me? Will there be a significant difference in the strength of the piece if I fire it at the high end of the range or the low end? And is a low fire clay a poor choice for a necklace pendant? Will it be fragile no matter how high it's fired?
0

#2 User is online   OffCenter Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 919
  • Joined: 01-April 10
  • LocationLizella, Georgia

Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:30 AM

View PostIsculpt, on 02 October 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:

I usually work in terra cotta or other low fire clays. When there is a firing range given for a clay, I understand that the high end of the range will provide the most strength in the finished, fired piece (although I'm told that it won't become vitreous if it's lowfire clay), but what, specifically, is the lower number telling me? Will there be a significant difference in the strength of the piece if I fire it at the high end of the range or the low end? And is a low fire clay a poor choice for a necklace pendant? Will it be fragile no matter how high it's fired?


Depends on how accurate the given range is. Amazingly, most clay producers don't even do MOR test on their clays and some advertize clays as having a "maturity" range from something like cone 3 to cone 10 which is total BS. It is either way underfired at cone 3 or way overfired at cone 10. I've always assumed firing any clay as high as you can without it beginning to deform will result in that clay's strongest state, but John B. here says that isn't true, that a clay can begin to lose strength from overfiring before it deforms. But, still, it's a pretty sure bet that if your clay's maturity range is from cone 04 to cone 01 that it will be stronger at cone 01 than at cone 04.

Clay strength depends of the composition of the clay, lack of additives like sand and grog, and being fired to full maturity, not how high it is fired. Pete Pinnell's MOR tests even showed earthenware fired to maturity was stronger than the stonewares and porcelains fired to maturity at cone 10 that he tested. Rob Roy later questioned the accuracy of the earthenware part of the test. In short, if your terra cotta is grog- and sand-free and fired to maturity, it should be as strong as most other clays.

Jim
E pur si muove.

"But it does move," said Galileo under his breath.
0

#3 User is offline   Chris Campbell Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,358
  • Joined: 07-April 10
  • LocationRaleigh, NC

Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:45 AM

For jewelry, a lot of potters make choices based on color results ... the same red clay looks extremely different at all the various firing temps. They stop when they like the color.
As to its being fragile ... its jewelry so it's supposed to be treated with care ... I have glass jewelry, fragile beads, raku pendants ... nothing broken yet.
Chris Campbell
Contemporary Fine Colored Porcelain
www.ccpottery.com

"My Artwork would not exist without a thriving global pottery community.
In the isolation of a studio, an artist can begin to feel like an island, but in truth
we are all part of archipelagoes; chains of islands loosely connected by a stream
of information that enhances our Artwork.”
0

#4 User is online   OffCenter Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 919
  • Joined: 01-April 10
  • LocationLizella, Georgia

Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:01 AM

View PostChris Campbell, on 02 October 2012 - 11:45 AM, said:

For jewelry, a lot of potters make choices based on color results ... the same red clay looks extremely different at all the various firing temps. They stop when they like the color.
As to its being fragile ... its jewelry so it's supposed to be treated with care ... I have glass jewelry, fragile beads, raku pendants ... nothing broken yet.


Good point. I like Lizella Red which goes through a whole range of reds from a pale orange around cone 1 getting darker until it is a dark brown at its maturity at cone 8. I like it best around cone 4 but usually fire it to cone 6. For about a century this clay was used to make flower pots from shot glass-size to pots big enough for a kid to hide in and they were shipped all over the country packed in a little pine straw. They were fired to about cone 010.

Jim
E pur si muove.

"But it does move," said Galileo under his breath.
0

#5 User is offline   Isculpt Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 176
  • Joined: 03-April 10

Posted 02 October 2012 - 09:23 PM

Well, Jim, I hope Pete Pinnell is right about the strength of low fire clays, since I got deeply into the jewelry thing before I considered the question of final strength of the fired clay! And Chris, you have a point about the inherent fragility of jewelry. When I sold my woodcarvings, whether jewelry or sculpture, I sent them out with a promise of "lifetime free repairs". Given that I've just finished repairing a 25 year-old wood sculpture -- gratis, you'd think I'd let that whole worrying-about-durability thing go! Now that I'm working in something far more breakable than wood, I believe I'll have to.
;) Jayne
0

#6 User is offline   DAY Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 145
  • Joined: 19-January 11

Posted 03 October 2012 - 05:52 AM

There is not much difference -temp wise- between cones. 06=1823 vs 04=1886. That's only 53 degrees.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users