Dilemma-Cone 6 Or Cone 06?
#1
Posted 10 July 2010 - 11:38 AM
What would others recommend-changing over to cone 6 and purchasing all new glazes etc? or continuing to work in cone 05-06? I also know that mid-firing and high-firing puts more wear and tear on my new kiln. I don't want to false advertise my work and want my customers to able to wash my work in the dishwasher and heat it as neccessary.
Any feedback, advice comments would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
Possible 06->6 convert
#2
Posted 10 July 2010 - 02:50 PM
Lisa Naples, for example, makes beautiful functional earthenware fires to ^2 or 02, I don't remember. She just said she fired her earthenware to vitrification so it is hard and durable. She learned that from a ceramic engineer who took her class.. I met Lisa at the show after NCECA. She really does lovely work. I would say that most earthenware fired to ^06 is not vitrified , will collect moisture, will be punky, and may have steam escape if used in a microwave which might explode. Majolica fired onto earthenware is usually bisqued to ^04 as you are doing, or higher ^02 sometimes. It is also glazed all over stilts in firing to avoid moisture absorption which can cause the glaze to flake off. That is why you often find the three marks from stilts on the bottom of majolica. So you really need to decide what you want to do. But some of your reasoning seems a little misinformed.
Check out Lisa's work. She is an inspiration for earthernware.
#3
Posted 10 July 2010 - 10:07 PM
#4
Posted 12 July 2010 - 12:45 PM
#5
Posted 12 July 2010 - 04:10 PM
#6
Posted 13 July 2010 - 05:40 AM
I would hesitate to research a commercial product and make claims based on what the vendor says, since you will be liable for what you say, not the vendor.
Your whole question falls into the category of "standing by" and "wait for it" - in other words you don't actually know until you actually know.
- h a n s e n -
Stone House Studio, Alexandria, Virginia
americanpotter.blogspot.com
thesuddenschool.blogspot.com
#7
Posted 13 July 2010 - 05:45 AM
Stone House Studio, Alexandria, Virginia
americanpotter.blogspot.com
thesuddenschool.blogspot.com
#8
Posted 13 July 2010 - 07:32 AM
#9
Posted 14 July 2010 - 04:12 PM
I will switch clay bodies for my 05-06 work and continue to use my older 05-06 glazes for this.
once again thanks for answering and sharing your expertise!
#10
Posted 15 July 2010 - 06:02 AM
To fire the cone 05-06, what ever the more popular cone is (?) - those pieces need to be fully immersed in glaze before firing, and set up on stilts. You can google stilts for ceramic applications easy enough to see what I'm talking about. The commercial low fire glazes rival the higher fired ones for hardness and durability, surprisingly enough.
I want to say that the same qualities that make clay bodies thermal shock resistant as for example raku firing would also work for oven ware, for example, extra grog, coarse fireclay, kyanite, pyrophilite, but I'm not real sure about this. Often in more primitive settings, underfired earthenware serves the purpose very well. Out of curiositry I bought some generic oven-ware from the grocery store. This is an interesting topic and I wish i knew more.
h a n s e n
Stone House Studio, Alexandria, Virginia
americanpotter.blogspot.com
thesuddenschool.blogspot.com
#11
Posted 16 July 2010 - 09:10 PM
#12
Posted 17 July 2010 - 06:01 AM
pent19, on 16 July 2010 - 08:10 PM, said:
Why would someone stilt at ^6. The point of stilting ^06 is to seal nonvitrified clay. ^6 clay should be vitrifying unless you are using ^10 clay and only taking it to ^6. You can stilt clay if you bisque fire to the same temperature but then adhering glazes can be tricky. Originally crystalline glazes were bisqued to ^10 , then fitted to a kiln washed soft brick and refired to ^10 with the glaze. I believe this practice was followed in the early 1900s at Champaign -Urbana IU Department of ceramics/Ceramics engineering. I did a lot of research there in the 1970s for my thesis on crystalline glazes.
The point is...if you use a stilt, the clay needs to be fired only as high as previously fired or shrinkage on three points during the firing will created deforming as you called it.
#13
Posted 17 July 2010 - 09:19 AM
Marcia is dead on correct when she says that vitrification is not dependant on the firing cone.
It is the glassification of the clay body that matters. Lower temperature clays can be made that become vitreous by adding fluxing materials that promote melting of the glassy matrix of the body. The caveat here is that as the cone end point goes down, it gets a bit harder to do that withouty affecting the handling characteristics of the clay for typical "handcraft potter" type forming methods.
The next thought,.....
There is pretty much no such thing as a "cone 6 to cone 10 clay body". Manufacturers make such bodies because to do otherwise would require too many stock clay bodies sitting around the warehouse. If the body actually is well designed to be fully vitrious at cone 6....... it is overfired at cone 10. And if it is really vitreous at cone 10... then it is underfired at cone 6. Now it is possible that the "6-10 body" is actually deliberately optimal at cone 8....right in the middle.... and is "acceptable" or "OK" at either 6 or 10. How one defines "acceptable" or "OK" is the potential issue.
For many things ... "OK" is just fine. For others, it is not. You have to figure out if "OK" actually fits your needs.. or if you need to have a more tightly controlled, specifically formulated clay body.
For legal and insurance purposes, to formally label something "Microwave Safe" or "Dishwasher Safe", you'd best have the data to prove that you have complied with at least one of the international testing organizations standards for determining such things. There are a number of people out in the world publishing standards for ceramic objects... the most common in the USA is ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials)....but there are others.
For example .................. "Microwave Safe" = http://www.astm.org/...dards/C1607.htm
As hansen pointed out already....... you are not indemnified by the manufacturer of the products you use in the manufacture of your products when it comes to potential legal claims. Just because they say their product is "food safe" does not protect you from an "it was not food safe" claim. And most cetramic suppliers have a pretty good release of liability statement on their advertising / websites that says they are not responsible for how you use the products they sell.
So it pays to "do your homework" technically and to know your materials and how your products stand up. If you are not willing to go thru the necessary background work, then maybe just tell people that your claywork is special and prescious and deserves the care of not placing it in the dishwasher or microwave.
best,
.........................john
Immediate Past President; Potters Council
Professor of Ceramics; New Hampshire Insitute of Art
http://www.JohnBaymore.com
#16
Posted 22 September 2010 - 12:08 AM
I use to fire earthenware clay to ^1 and applie mason stain slip under thinned ^04 clear glaze> vitrivied clay body and food safe ware.

Sign In
Register
Help











MultiQuote


