L: When Hermann Seger first developed the cone idea it was based on a constant ratio between in Unity between Calcium and Potassium of exactly 0.7 to 0.3 = 1.0 - then the ratio of alumina to silica kept at exactly 1:10 - okay? so then 0.7 Ca + 0.3 Na + .03 Alumina + 3.0 Silica when fritted and manufactured into a cone melted at cone 3. See? Look at the numbers for Alumina and Silica in the example. While keeping the Ca & Na equalling 1.0 if you insted used 0.5 alumina and 5.0 silica = cone 5. 0.9 alumina + 9.0 silica = cone 9
Although Orton uses slightly different proportions, the idea is still the same. Cone is an exp
ression in Unity of chemical ratios. It has nothing to do with temperature. The point of deformation of the cone of course, becomes possible through advancing temperature, but time is a factor as well. For example, in old China the temperature reached was never beyond what a 12 hour firing to cone 6 would reach, but they fired for 10 days to cone 10-11.
Reaching 1300 degrees and holding for one hour is very different than holding 1300 degrees for 12 hours, for example.
In the days of programmable controllers we have now begun to use temperature instead of cone. We use our kilns more like ovens when actually they are a bit like welding torches - you want your material to reach the proper melting points so you have to factor both time and temperature; this is called "heat-work" - additionally, the thermal mass of the wares, hot face, and kiln settings and furniture plays a part in defining the ramp of the kiln both up and down.
It is an interesting study in and of itself, I would never call it irrelevant if you want to be proficient and well-informed as to ceramics techniques. Orton has a CD you can ask for too, probably free. Do a google search and see what resources are available. At certain time & temperature points, say a kiln increasing at 100 degrees and hour, there is an estimation of what cone you are at. This is different in a kiln increasing at 300 degrees an hour, so Orton has plotted a chart.
Archeological analysis can tell us what is in a glaze or clay, the ultimate percentage analysis or UPA, whach can be converted into Unity; and to what temperature it has been fired. Archeology can tell us what the kiln was constructed like. What it cannot tell us is cone - not yet anyway
h a n s e n
p.s. kilns rely on cheap pyrometers which are exposed to the heat so they will gradually give a different reading especially when they are going bad. Some pyrometers are better than others. The best measured light waves however, and are usually highly accurate over time. Expensive however.
Laragh, on 09 July 2010 - 11:32 AM, said:
Thanks Jessica!
That does help a lot

I am still wondering though,
why people use them? Everyone I know in Europe has never used them ! Any insight on that? I know they show you heat distribution etc ..but unless your kiln is on the fritz and inconsistent what is the need for them? Is it because people mostly use manual as opposed to digital here??
